Doug henderson gary null


















Is it little wonder then that we are being intimidated and frightened into believing that mandatory vaccination is being touted even though the science of efficacy and safety, even the need, for these new swine flu vaccines is patently unproven.

It is perhaps one of the largest falsehoods ever perpetuated on humanity that dwarfs the sleaze on Wall Street. Yet if we are a pharmaceutical executive, or a lobbyist representing a drug company who has collected a litany of charges including medical fraud, criminal salesmanship, gaming the insurance industries, repeated lying to federal officials, and manipulation of data regarding life-threatening adverse effects of drugs that have killed so many people, we can walk away with a fine, a surge in the stock market after a settlement, a financial bonus, and the personal satisfaction in not having to apologize so we can continue business as usual.

Every American who is prescribed a drug by a physician has the belief that that pill has undergone rigorous trials to scrutinize its safety. And when there are known potential adverse effects, we blindly assume these are known to the attending physician. However, this is a myth perpetuated not only by drug makers, but by our own federal health agencies.

For example, a group of Swiss investigators filed an FOI to procure trial data about the musculoskeletal pain drug Celecoxib and received back only 16 of the 27 trials conducted on it. These are just several examples among numerous others. The pharmaceutical industrial complex is perhaps the largest, most influential cartel in the world.

This becomes evident after considering the billions of dollars and other currencies drug companies have been forced to pay for a wide variety of corruption charges. It is extremely difficult to comprehend why the United States principle federal health agencies, particularly the FDA and National Institutes of Health NIH , with the specific mandate to provide oversight on all pre-approved drug applications and delegated with the task to assure drugs are safe or at least specify clearly their known dangers, are so reprehensible and inept.

It is not to far afield to suggest that as it stands now the US regulatory agencies are an extension of corporate America. As serial offenders of product safety cover-ups for over a decade, drugs have injured and killed millions. Only in America could you kill 44, and not go to jail and get a raise. Should we assume, therefore, that the pharmaceutical complex should be trusted without challenge? We have also been asked to believe that the manufacturers were guided by a sense of public service.

But when examining the top ten drugs sold, the facts reveal otherwise. Pharmaceutical companies make profits higher than oil companies. But nowhere is it felt more than in the legal system. In a recently concluded, short-term study, we found cases involving Big Pharma in which either the case ended in a verdict against the pharmaceutical company or the company settled.

The number of cases is staggering, as are the dollar amounts. These cases cover practically every type of civil and criminal case. From products that kill, harm and maim, to false claims, to not paying taxes, to patent infringements, to bribery, to publishing false scientific journals.

Yet, in spite of the tens of thousands of lawsuits won against Big Pharma, it still conducts business as usual. Eli Lilly flooded state Medicaid programs with Zyprexa: its superstar, antipsychotic drug. Did Lilly also know of the possibility that Zyprexa could cause diabetes, which was also kept concealed under the protection of the FDA?

They most certainly did, which makes their behavior all the more reprehensible. In , British and Japanese regulatory agencies issued a warning that Zyprexa may cause diabetes. In addition, even after the FDA issued a similar warning in , Lilly did not pull Zyprexa from the market. This becomes all the more understandable after it is taken into consideration that Lilly is also the largest maker of diabetes medications. Merck is steeped in a well-documented record of criminality.

Such actions include, but are not limited to, intentionally hiding the liver-damaging effects of its cholesterol drug, intentionally withholding the release of clinical data that revealed the failures of another cholesterol drug; it has dumped vaccine waste and manufacturing chemicals into water supplies; it opened up offshore banking accounts to avoid paying billions of dollars in U. Department of Justice and the SEC enforce, it is illegal to bribe a foreign government official in order to obtain or retain business.

Unfortunately, too many Americans and citizens in other nations are blindly willing to surrender their faith and trust to medical experts, the latest drug or vaccine on the market, and the federal regulators who are mandated to assure that these medications and vaccines have been scrupulously reviewed to evaluate their safety and efficacy profiles.

We assume that medical interventions are evidence-based. We believe they are founded upon scientifically sound and reliable observation, data collection and analysis. Yet we only need to look at modern history to find many examples of Western medicine being categorically wrong. In the s and throughout the s, millions of Americans smoked. In some households every adult smoked. Even physicians, who were viewed as the exemplars of health and knowledge, smoked regularly.

Doctors would be featured on advertisements endorsing different cigarette brands. After a smoker reached 40, being diabetic, overweight, or having a cardiovascular illness and emphysema was considered normal aging. Medical leaders assured us that this could not possibly be associated with smoking. Leemon McHenry views the epidemic of bad medical research as similar to dirty money laundering.

After reviewing thousands of clinical trial documents, he observed the means by which pharmaceutical companies intentionally design flawed clinical trials favoring their drugs and vaccines, generate dubious data and then wash it through a corrupt methodology to make the product look clean at the other end. Drug makers have mastered these tricks and our regulatory officials are consistently fooled and left none the wiser.

For those who grew up in the Great and Baby Boom generations, stress reduction was virtually unknown. Exercise was perceived as unnecessary after high school and college.

A plant-based or vegetarian diet was viewed as extreme. The different iterations of the American food pyramid, starting with the Food for Young Children guide in and leading up to the Daily Food Guide, suffered from a serious lack of knowledge and a misunderstanding about nutrition. There was little bimolecular understanding about the dangers of sugar and excessive salt.

Processed foods, preservatives and chemical dyes were being completely ignored. The unholy truth being that once enough people believe in a paradigm such as AIDS, then it takes on a life of its own. See also tape 12 [Part One] and tape 14 [Part Three]. Are there immune enhancing alternative treatments [herbs, nutrients and nutrition etc] for AIDS.

Gary Null says yes, but to the detriment of AIDS patients, they are not being used - hence needless people. There is nothing left to do but hand out prescriptions for toxic drugs. But in this monologue, Gary Null shares unheard voices so far of patients, despite once being diagnosed with full-blown AIDS, reversed their immune system decline, and whose health to this day is thriving. The hallmark of a hypothesis [he states] is measured by its success.

Nothing came out of it in spite of over AIDS has failed every prediction of an infectious disease that you can possibly make, based on years of science or years of rigorous science in the modern sense.

Catalogue number Time: 32 minutes. Gary Null talks about AIDS, in particular the fast-track lifestyle of homosexuals and heterosexuals, and the connection to recreational drug abuse. This has destroyed the lives of so many people intent on aggressively pursuing the pleasures of the flesh to such an extent as to make themselves very ill. He offers a very disturbing scenerio of what we are now calling AIDS. He says " You see, when you get past the emotion, you get past the self-serving hyperbole, you get past the special interest groups, you get past the The most comprehensive independent investigation ever completed by anyone on the subjest of AIDS.

Gary Null challenges the established dogma reflecting the unheard voices from around the world on the war of AIDS. Time 57 minutes. The most comprehensive independent exploration ever completed by anyone on the subject of AIDS. Gary Null continues on from part one [tape ] of this special investigative report challenging the AIDS dogma.

All the conclusions we have been accustomed to, the information we have been force-fed is wrong. There is an awful lot of suppression going on. Gary Null continues on from part two [tape ] of this special investigative report, the culmination of ten years research in the field, challenging the established AIDS dogma.

The HIV test is a fraudulent test, and no one should have it.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000