We can develop solutions very quickly. NET Framework and other solutions. Updated: January Download now. We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:. We have built internal capability so that we use it extensively internally.
It is also easier to use with the outside data. So, it is a lot more flexible in the language that it supports. NET Framework is a very good framework. It does what I need it to do. NET is simply is the easiest programming language to use, based on my experience.
I think that the future is in the utilization of the product in a product as a service way which is something that is lacking at this moment.
Oracle has more powerful stability, availability, and real-time serving. NET Is still heavy or dependant on other Microsoft libraries and frameworks. At surface value, the distinction between Websphere and Tomcat seems simple - one supports the necessary components to run business applications, and one does not. However, recent changes in the world of enterprise Java have complicated this simple evaluation. These specialized Java objects provided a way of encapsulating business logic within a single container, providing support for advanced functions such as session persistence, JMS events, JCE, concurrency, and JTA.
However, a few major changes have eliminated this distinction in many cases. These frameworks provide methods of easily achieving many of the same things made possible by Java EE features such as EJBs, without the requirement of a full application server. Some of these networks were developed in part to address gaps and frustrations with the EJB and Java EE specifications, which were slow to provide features desired by developers working within an increasingly agile-minded industry.
Lastly, and perhaps most importantly, with the release of Java EE 6, many issues and gaps that made frameworks such as Spring and Hibernate so attractive have been addressed at a native level within the Java framework itself. Recognizing that different situations call for different levels of server complexity, the new release made many of its components modular, as well as creating a new process by which various "profiles" could be proposed through new JSRs, allowing for lighter versions of Java EE Containers to still be considered Java EE compliant.
As the Java EE 6 adoption process continues, building business applications designed for lightweight environments and better performance will continue to become easier and easier.
To sum it all up, while at one time Websphere and Tomcat would have been strongly differentiated by the Java technologies they supported, new developments in the Java landscape have brought Tomcat closer to Websphere in terms of Java functionality. Value differentiations between the two products are now increasingly centered around other factors. As we demonstrated in the last section, the boundaries between servlet containers and application servers have become increasingly blurry in the last few years.
A skilled team of architects and developers could feasibly develop a Tomcat-based infrastructure that would provide functionalities mirroring many of those offered by Websphere using frameworks, extensions, and custom tooling. If the technology is not a firm boundary, what are the other factors differentiating Websphere from Tomcat?
It all comes down to the best solution for the job. Ultimately, the choice between Websphere and Tomcat is a choice between two different kinds of risks. When you host your applications on Websphere, you're choosing a set of known risks, including potentially prohibitive expense, high performance overhead, a single vendor to contract with, and some degree of platform lock-in. When you take on these known risks, you hope to gain a number of benefits in return, including a well-known platform with proven stability, a large set of GUI administration tools, and a contract that includes service assurances.
However, while some of the benefits of hosting your application on Websphere, such as administrative tools and stability, can also become benefits of a Tomcat infrastructure, others, such as the support of a major vendor, or assurance of service, will be harder to attain, and some of them, such as the ability to purchase all of your services from a single vendor, will be close to impossible to recoup.
Additionally, you could potentially be shouldering one or more of the following risks: the need to produce your own documentation, the need to assemble a custom architecture from various components, and the need to support your own infrastructure, or purchase support.
The answer is that for the majority of developers, the benefits of running Tomcat, such as the freedom to use the IDE of their choice, rather than Websphere's proprietary IDEs, the fast server restart times which save hours and hours in development, and the flexibility to expand the network in the manner that they see as most beneficial to their use case, rather than following Websphere best practice, outweigh both the risks associated with a Tomcat-based infrastructure and the positives of basing a site on Websphere.
The fact of the matter is that the vast majority of web applications do not require most of the features that Websphere offers, nor do they need the additional "added value" differentiators of brand name or reputation. Impact of performance on license cost Is it fare to compare products as if they required exactly the same number of compute capacity? You wont compare the cost of a 4 ton truck to the cost of the 50 ton truck without considering the number of trucks needed to carry the load.
Why would you do the same with app servers? Not once. However I am not the only one who noticed the cost difference. And if someone invites you to race triathlon, you would know that bike alone is not enough. BTW: an absolute must read book for anyone. You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Google account. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email. You must be logged in to post a comment. Increased developer productivity Benefit from easy installation, fast startup and the ability to dynamically respond to application or config changes.
Modernise your legacy WebSphere applications with containers and microservices. We would love to hear from you! Get in touch with the online chatbot below or fill out the form by clicking here! Need Help? Talk to a specialist at DeeperThanBlue Get in touch.
Application Infrastructure related news:. Once complete, Read More. If you are interested in excelling in your market, becoming a digital disruptor or simply finding out more please get in touch. Get in touch. Link Text. Open link in a new tab.
0コメント